Volume 46, Issue 2

This Article claims that the significance of the imminence requirement is independent of the needs of the defender. Self-defense is not merely self preferential acting. Rather, self-defense is best understood…

This Note will first examine other countries’ attempts to control spam and the steps individuals have taken using technology and traditional causes of action. It will then look at the…

This Note argues that, by not providing any due process before or after assigning death row inmates to supermax conditions, the State is violating prisoners’ fundamental rights.

This Note considers the primary arguments that have been made for and against issuing draft opinions prior to oral argument.

After a brief introduction into the development of the regulatory takings 40 this Note examines the two aforementioned effects of the Tahoe Sierra decision and illustrates how they have already…

This Note weighs the arguments for and against having public school teachers lead students in the Pledge. This Note considers the Supreme Court’s alternatives and concludes that, under the Court’s…

The court held that later discovery of prosecutorial misconduct, albeit after subsequent retrials, will invoke the protections of the double jeopardy clause.

In Kromko, the Arizona Court of Appeals interpreted Arizona Revised Statute Section 9-500.14(A) to apply only in cases of the most obvious partisan dissemination of information.

The Arizona Supreme Court considered whether the Disproportionality Review Act was constitutional and whether commutation was an official act of the governor such that a letter of denial required the…