Volume 49, Issue 3

In earlier work, Ayres and Brown introduced the “Fair Employment Mark,” and its licensing agreement, which gives a licensee’s employees and applicants contract rights of action as third-party beneficiaries if…

Racial exploitation is now the powerful, conventional challenge to emerging discourses on alternative methodologies of procuring organs, especially markets. The evidence, including growing waitlists and thousands of deaths each year,…

This Article calls for an end to employers’ practice of requiring worker assent to “cubewrap” contracts---standardized agreements provided after initial acceptance of employment. Through delayed-term noncompete and arbitration agreements, employers…

This Article tracks the ongoing adaptation of U.S. contract law to the 1990s’ contraction of the welfare state. Some courts strive to compensate for the shortage of welfare services and…

In a world where terrorism and natural disasters have become part of the reality of American life, it is essential to identify how the federal government can respond to domestic…

This Note examines the United States Supreme Court’s construction of workplace retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and advocates for the application of this approach…

In State v. Grell, the Arizona Supreme Court addressed the question of whether placing such a burden on a defendant is unconstitutional in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision…

In Gipson v. Kasey, the Arizona Supreme Court took an unprecedented step toward clarifying the elements that a court should consider when determining whether a duty exists.