Current Issue

In-Laws and Outlaws

46 Ariz. L. Rev. 199 (2004)

Patricia Williams Isaac Marks Memorial Lecture View PDF

Defending Imminence: From Battered Women to Iraq

46 Ariz. L. Rev. 213 (2004)

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan Article View PDF

This Article claims that the significance of the imminence requirement is independent of the needs of the defender. Self-defense is not merely self preferential acting. Rather, self-defense is best understood…

Has the U.S. Canned Spam?

46 Ariz. L. Rev. 263 (2004)

Elizabeth A. Alongi Note View PDF

This Note will first examine other countries’ attempts to control spam and the steps individuals have taken using technology and traditional causes of action. It will then look at the…

“An Atypical and Significant Hardship”: The Supermax Confinement of Death Row Prisoners Based Purely on Status—A Plea for Procedural Due Process

46 Ariz. L. Rev. 291 (2004)

Robert M. Ferrier Note View PDF

This Note argues that, by not providing any due process before or after assigning death row inmates to supermax conditions, the State is violating prisoners’ fundamental rights.

Distributing Draft Decisions Before Oral Argument on Appeal: Should the Court Tip Its Tentative Hand? The Case for Dissemination

46 Ariz. L. Rev. 317 (2004)

Mark Hummels Note View PDF

This Note considers the primary arguments that have been made for and against issuing draft opinions prior to oral argument.

After Tahoe Sierra, One Thing is Clearer: There is Still a Fundamental Lack of Clarity

46 Ariz. L. Rev. 353 (2004)

Lise Johnson Note View PDF

After a brief introduction into the development of the regulatory takings 40 this Note examines the two aforementioned effects of the Tahoe Sierra decision and illustrates how they have already…