Current Issue

This Article argues that defamation should not be included in the new Restatement of Economic Torts, because, although redress of economic harm is one function of the law of libel…

Some intentional tort doctrines have developed in intriguing ways since the Restatement Second was published, and other doctrines remain contentious or obscure. From a broader perspective, we should beware of…

This Note considers cases in which plaintiffs seek reputational damages without pleading defamation. This Note focuses on instances of “stand-alone” reputational injury, where plaintiffs suffer no physical injury to their…

This Note examines the Arizona Revised Statutes as they apply to the restoration of civil rights. This Note focuses primarily on out-of-state individuals because Arizona has failed to clearly determine…

The Court held that neither Arizona’s insanity test, nor its exclusion of evidence to negate mens rea, violates due process.

In State v. Wall, the Arizona Supreme Court unanimously held that a defendant does not forfeit his right to a lesser-included-offense instruction when he pursues an all-or-nothing defense.

This Article recounts the tumultuous history of Arizona’s corporate attorney--client privilege. It explores how the court might best address the constitutionality of a 1994 statute that “overruled” its earlier decision…