Current Issue

This Note considers cases in which plaintiffs seek reputational damages without pleading defamation. This Note focuses on instances of “stand-alone” reputational injury, where plaintiffs suffer no physical injury to their…

This Note examines the Arizona Revised Statutes as they apply to the restoration of civil rights. This Note focuses primarily on out-of-state individuals because Arizona has failed to clearly determine…

The Court held that neither Arizona’s insanity test, nor its exclusion of evidence to negate mens rea, violates due process.

In State v. Wall, the Arizona Supreme Court unanimously held that a defendant does not forfeit his right to a lesser-included-offense instruction when he pursues an all-or-nothing defense.

This Article recounts the tumultuous history of Arizona’s corporate attorney--client privilege. It explores how the court might best address the constitutionality of a 1994 statute that “overruled” its earlier decision…

This Article traces the history and development of refusal clauses and describes the context in which the debate takes place, including the role the abortion controversy plays and the recent…

This Article analyzes the design of conservation incentives in light of behavioral psychology research and suggests ways to improve their efficacy. Psychological research offers insight into designing incentives, specifically direct…